essay

'Reluctant' or 'avant-garde' Hopewell?: suggestions of Middle Woodland culture change in east-central Indiana and south-central Ohio

hopewell archaeology : the chillicothe conferenceKent, Ohio • Published In 1979 • Pages: 59-63

By: Vickery, Kent D..

Abstract
Griffin summarized this article by stating, 'What did I call that New Castle stuff when I first saw it…? 'Reluctant Hopewell,' and I still think that this is a group participating in some of the ideas which are common to Hopewell, but haven't quite reached it yet.' (page 59). The differences in mortuary structure and earthwork orientations between the New Castle phase in Indiana and the Mound City Group in Ohio are compared. Later mound structures are found to be oriented toward a single structure. It appears to represent a concern for centralized ceremonial observance.
Subjects
Identification
Cultural participation
Religious and educational structures
Burial practices and funerals
Sacred objects and places
tradition
Hopewell
HRAF PubDate
2004
Region
North America
Sub Region
Eastern Woodlands
Document Type
essay
Evaluation
Creator Type
Archaeologist
Document Rating
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
Analyst
Sarah Berry ; 2003
Field Date
1969 and 1968
Coverage Date
circa 2100 BP-1800 BP (circa 100 B.C.- 200 A.D.)
Coverage Place
Mound City, Ohio; Anderson Group and New Castle Earthwork Complex, Indiana; United States
Notes
Kent D. Vickery
For bibliographical references see document 11: Brose and Greber
LCCN
79088607
LCSH
Hopewell culture