essay

Plant remains from the Walling truncated mound: evidence for Middle Woodland horticultural activities

Middle Woodland culture and Copena in the Tennessee Valley, by Vernon James Knight, Jr[University]Published In 1990 • Pages: 115-129

By: Scarry, C. Margaret.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Scarry describes the excavation procedures, recovery methods, and the laboratory methods used to obtain the botanical remains from the Walling site mound. The botanical samples from the premound midden and from Fill No. 2 midden were chosen for more detailed analysis. 'One of the more interesting features of the Walling assemblage is that such a small quantity of plant material produced a highly diverse seed and nut assemblage. It seems likely that this was partly a result of the ceremonial contexts from which the plant remains were recovered.' (page 126). Scarry also considers the Walling people to have been horticulturalists and briefly discusses their general gardening strategy.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Recording and collecting in the field
Organization and analysis of results of research
Laboratory analysis of materials other than dating methods in archaeology
Flora
Tillage
Cereal agriculture
Cultural stratigraphy
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Eastern Middle Woodland
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2005
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Eastern Woodlands
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeobotanist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Sarah Berry ; 2003
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
1986
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1900 BP-1650 BP (100 A.D.-350 A.D.)
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Walling site (1MA33), Madison County, Alabama, United States
NotesAdditional notes
by C. Margaret Scarry
For bibliographical references see document 25: Knight
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
90622519
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Woodland culture