essay

The role of population movement and technology transfer in the manufacture of prehistoric Southwestern ceramics

ceramic production in the american southwestTucsonPublished In 1995 • Pages: 115-141

By: Zedeño, María Nieves.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Differential distributions of prehistoric ceramics over broad areas of the American Southwest are often interpreted as the result of exchange networks of varied magnitude and complexity. Much effort has been devoted to the reconstruction of the ceramic distribution system and their economic, social, and political implications....However, current evidence of population movement throughout Southwestern prehistory...strongly suggests that variation in the ceramic record was the result of not only the circulation of pottery, but also the movement of people bearing knowledge on distinctive pottery technologies. This article reviews recent data on ceramic manufacture and circulation during the late Pueblo III period occupation of the Grasshopper region in east-central Arizona…to illustrate how population movement had a major role in the generation of highly varied assemblages (p. 115).
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Ceramic technology
Internal migration
Visual arts
Cultural participation
Inter-community relations
Exchange transactions
Sociocultural trends
Acculturation and culture contact
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Early Anasazi
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2012
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Southwest and Basin
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle; 2011
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
no date
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
850-700 BP (AD 1150-1300)
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Grasshopper Region, East-Central Arizona, United States
NotesAdditional notes
María Nieves Zedeño
Includes bibliographical references (p. 133-141)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
9500877195008771
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Pueblo pottery--Themes, motives
Pueblo pottery--Classification
Ceramic materials--Southwest, New--Analysis
Ethnoarchaeology--Southwest, New
Southwest, New--Antiquities