essay

Cultural and political networks in the ancient Near East during the fourth and third millennia B.C.

uruk mesopotamia & its neighbors : cross-cultural interactions in the era of state formationSante Fe, NmPublished In 2001 • Pages: 149-179

By: Nissen, Hans Jörg.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
In this article Nissen describes one of the greatest problems in the interpretation of events and trends in the Greater Mesopotamian region during the fourth millennium BC - the Uruk period. Despite a century of excavation work at Uruk-Warka, the collected data from the site is surprisingly mute on chronological issues, although it does convey the information that the city was of amazing size and internal complexity containing a society that was extremely formalized in its hierarchical organization. This hierarchy, built upon control of the city's hinterland and its labor potential, was unparalleled in the Uruk period. In order to understand the long-term trends at work in this region Nissen focuses on the entanglements of southern Mesopotamia and its neighbors in temporal and spatial contexts, even though much of his data remains hypothetical he presents it with the hope that future research will fill in the blanks and possibly correct the statements made in the study.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Theoretical orientation in research and its results
Historical reconstruction
Acculturation and culture contact
Writing
Chronologies and culture sequences
Cultural stratigraphy
Settlement patterns
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Late Chalcolithic Mesopotamia
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2000
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Middle East
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Middle East
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle; 2006
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
no date
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
6000-5000 BP (4000-3000 BC)
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Uruk-Warka, Iraq
NotesAdditional notes
Hans J. Nissen
For bibliographical references see document 17:Rothman
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
2001049321
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Middle East--Civilization--To 622/Erech (Extinct city)