essay

A Consideration of the social organization of the Shell Mound Archaic

archaeology of the mid-holocene southeastGainesvillePublished In 1996 • Pages: 235-258

By: Claassen, Cheryl P..

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Claassen discusses the Shell Mound Archaic which occurred during the Middle and Late Archaic. As Claassen doesn't usually distinguish between the Middle and Late Archaic when discussing particular sites, the reader is urged to use caution. Claassen discusses how shell mounds were more than middens and may have been purposely constructed to act as territorrial markers and places to bury the dead. She points out that freshwater shellfish can be found in large quantities in more places than one finds shell mounds so 'neither optimal foraging theory nor environmental change can explain either their advent or demise. Instead, sites attributable to the [Shell Mound Archaic] constitute a landscape shaped by social concerns' (page 242). To explore the possible social processes involved, Claassen examines mortuary data (especially beads) and looks at gender differences and exchange and social status.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Identification
Theoretical orientation in research and its results
Fauna
Ornament
Settlement patterns
Burial practices and funerals
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Eastern Middle Archaic
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2001
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Eastern Woodlands
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Sarah Berry ; 2000
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
no date
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
8000 BP - 5000 BP
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Southeast United States
NotesAdditional notes
Cheryl P. Claassen
For bibliographical references see Anonymous, 1996.
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
95045466
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Indians of North America--Middle West--Antiquities