article

Chumash architecture: sweat lodges and houses

Journal of California and Great Basin anthropology17 (1)Published In 1995 • Pages: 54-92

By: Gamble, Lynn Hunter.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Lynn Gamble reviews the ethnographic, ethnohistoric, and archaeological literature, including some of her own work, to identify the distinguishing archaeological characteristics of Chumash houses and sweatlodges. Most of her archaeological examples date from the Late to Historic Periods. She determines sweatlodges tended to be larger than houses, lacked interior storage, had larger interior posts, had been burned, often had plastered floors and interior rims, and usually had their hearths in the southern section of the structure. Post holes for houses tend to be more numerous and most will be found along the outside rim of the floor. Smaller post holes found in the interior of the floor were probably used for beds or to create sleeping partitions.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Archaeological excavation methods
Prehistory
Dwellings
Outbuildings
Furniture
Building interiors and arrangement
Heating and lighting equipment
Cultural stratigraphy
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Late Southern California
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2000
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Northwest Coast and California
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
article
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Sarah Berry ; 1998
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
1969-1970 and 1986-1987
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1700 BP - 190 BP (A.D. 300 - A.D. 1810)
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Chumash, Calif., United States
NotesAdditional notes
Lynn Gamble
Includes bibliographical references (p. 90-92)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
80640525
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
California--Antiquities