essay

Patterns of Late Preclassic interaction and the formation of complex society in the southeast Maya periphery

formation of complex society in southeastern mesoamericaBoca RatonPublished In 1991 • Pages: 121-142

By: Schortman, Edward M., Urban, Patricia A. (Patricia Ann).

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This study is a synthesis of the ceramic material from various collections representing different sites in the Southeast Maya periphery. The region and sites included are Los Naranjos, Comayagua Valley, Río Pelo, Colonía Care, Santo Domingo, Central Santa Barbara, Copan, Quelepa, Santa Rita, Playa de los Muertos, and La Guacamaya. The object of the study is to ascertain patterns of interregional interaction in the Late Preclassic period and suggest how these interactions might have influenced sociopolitical change in region. The authors examined the distribution among the above regions and sites of the following ceramic systems: Negative-Painted, Red-Slipped Monochromes, Orange-Slipped Monochromes, White-Slipped Monochromes, Black-Brown Slipped Monochromes, Painted Bichromes, Zoned Painted, Zoned Incised or Stamped, Trichromes, and Unslipped Incised-Neck Jars. They found no evidence of widespread ceramic spheres. Rather sites were linked to each other by different sets of ceramic commonalities, which suggests a pattern of diffuse interaction and trade.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Identification
Ceramic technology
Utensils
Chronologies and culture sequences
Typologies and classifications
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Preclassic Maya
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2001
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Middle America and the Caribbean
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Maya Area
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Ian Skoggard ; 2000
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
not specified
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
2200-1800 BP
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador
NotesAdditional notes
Edward M. Schortman ; Patricia A. Urban
Revised papers from the 86th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Chicago, Nov. 1987, and additional material
Includes bibliographical references (p. 139-142)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
91010478
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Mayas--Antiquities