book chapter

Early agriculture at Chogha Mish

chogha mish by pinhas delougaz and helene j. kantorChicagoPublished In 1996 • Pages: 307-317

By: Woosley, Anne I..

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
From a preliminary analysis of the botanic material obtained from Chogha Mish, Woosley suggests two interesting though tentative conclusions about the prehistoric agriculture practiced at the site: (1)the examination of carbonized seeds from Chogha Mish does not support the significance of cereals as early domesticates during the earliest occupations levels at the site, and (2)that for several thousand years of agriculture results seem to indicated an emphasis on legume crops, such as Pisum, Lens, and Vicia, over cereals. Only with the coming of a fully established agricultural economy during Protoliterate times do cereals become a significant component of the subsistence exploitation pattern. This suggests that at Chogha Mish the earliest domestic crops of economic importance were the legumes, not the cereals (p. 316).
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Archaeological excavation methods
Laboratory analysis of materials other than dating methods in archaeology
Tillage
Cereal agriculture
Flora
Organization and analysis of results of research
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Late Chalcolithic Mesopotamia
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2000
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Middle East
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Middle East
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
book chapter
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle; 2007
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
no date
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
6000-5000 BP (4000-3000 BC)
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Chogha Mish, Iran
NotesAdditional notes
Anne I. Woosley
For bibliographical references see document 32:Delougaz and Kantor
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
95072170
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Excavations (Archaeology)--Iran--Chogha Mish/Chogha Mish (Iran)--Antiquities