essay
The Late Archaic and Early Woodland periods in Virginia: interpretation and explanation within an eastern context
late archaic and early woodland research in virginia : a synthesis • (23) • Published In 1991 • Pages: 221-235
By: Hodges, Mary Ellen N. (Mary Ellen Norrisey).
AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Hodges discusses the '(1) reduction of residential mobility through time…(2) expansion of the subsistence base with subsequent intensification in the use of certain resources… and (3) development of ceramic technologies. A brief review of how archaeologists have interpreted and explained the Late Archaic-Early Woodland record in Virginia is followed by discussion of some models which have been proposed to explain developments elsewhere in the East.' (page 222). Egloff writes about the Late Archaic and the Early Woodland, but only the material that pertains to the Early Woodland were indexed for OCM (Outline of Cultural Materials) subjects.
- SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
- Theoretical orientation in research and its results
- Flora
- Acculturation and culture contact
- Sociocultural trends
- Ceramic technology
- Settlement patterns
- traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
- Eastern Early Woodland
- HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
- 2000
- RegionThe area the document pertains to
- North America
- Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
- Eastern Woodlands
- Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
- essay
- Evaluation
- Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
- Archaeologist
- Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
- 4: Excellent Secondary Data
- AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
- Sarah Berry ; 2005
- Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
- no date
- Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
- Late Archaic-Early Woodland; 5000 BP-2500 BP (3000 B.C.-500 B.C.)
- Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
- Virginia, United States
- NotesAdditional notes
- Mary Ellen N. Hodges
- Includes bibliographical references (p. 235-242)
- LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
- Indians of North America--Antiquities