book chapter

The development of Adena Culture and its role in the formation of Ohio Hopewell

hopewellian studies12 (1)Published In 1964 • Pages: 1-34

By: Dragoo, Don W..

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Dragoo discusses the relationship between the Adena Culture and the Hopewell Culture. He reviews some of the Hopewell practices that had their origin in Adena, such as certain design elements and similarities between some Adena 'Robbins' blades and projectile points, etc. Dragoo believes the long-headed Lenid peoples moved into the Ohio Valley while the Adena were still in the area. The two groups persisted side by side for several hundred years after which the higher ranked Adena peoples moved to the south and to the east. The rest of the Adena peoples were absorbed into the Hopewell. While the two groups lived near each other there was 'blending and modification of original traits contributed by both peoples…' (page 34). This paper is mainly about Adena, how it changed in Late Adena times, and how it influenced and was influenced by the Hopewell. Only the data that pertain to the Hopewell were indexed for OCM (Outline of Cultural Materials) subjects.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Racial identification
Historical reconstruction
Acculturation and culture contact
Visual arts
Burial practices and funerals
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Hopewell
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2004
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Eastern Woodlands
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
book chapter
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Sarah Berry ; 2003
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
Not specified
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
Middle Woodland
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Ohio; United States
NotesAdditional notes
By Don W. Dragoo
For bibliographical references see document 4: [Caldwell and Hall]
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
a 65000555
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Hopewell culture