book chapter

The Hopewell Complex of Ohio

hopewellian studies12 (2)Published In 1964 • Pages: 35-83

By: Prufer, Olaf H..

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Prufer summarizes the data on the Ohio Hopewell as of 1964. Prufer believes Illinois was the area from which much of the more spectacular Hopewell material was derived but it was in Ohio that Hopewell attained its 'climax.' Prufer discusses some of the Adena traits that continued to be seen in Hopewell such as certain ceramics, cremation (seen in Early Hopewell), cruciform gorgets, etc. He discusses the eleven radiocarbon dates then available and which sites he thought were Early, Middle, Late, or Latest Hopewell. Prufer examines the connections Ohio Hopewell had with Illinois Hopewell and other cultures and discusses trade. There was a change in Ohio Hopewell from short, broad heads to long-headed people and Prufer believes these people came from Illinois. The end of Hopewell is discussed and Prufer states the Hopewell settlement pattern may have changed from the vacant ceremonial center with semi-permanent shifting agricultural village to hilltop enclosures or fortifications. Prufer rules out direct Mesoamerican contact to account for some of the Hopewell traits and puts forth the idea that the Hopewell descendents are the Algonkians.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Identification
Reviews and critiques
Dating methods in archaeology
Comparative evidence
Prehistory
Ceramic technology
Burial practices and funerals
Sacred objects and places
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Hopewell
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2004
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Eastern Woodlands
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
book chapter
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Sarah Berry ; 2003
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
not specified
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
2335 BP±210 - 1385 BP±70 (335 B.C.±210 - 615 A.D.±70)
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Ohio; United States
NotesAdditional notes
By Olaf H. Prufer
For bibliographical references see document 4: [Caldwell and Hall]
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
a 65000555
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Hopewell culture