essay

An overview of the Chillicothe Hopewell Conference

hopewell archaeology : the chillicothe conferenceKent, OhioPublished In 1979 • Pages: 266-279

By: Griffin, James Bennett.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Griffin was a discussant for the the Chillicothe conference and this chapter contains his comments on the various papers (eHRAF documents nos. 12-45). In doing so, Griffin presents an overview of Hopewell culture. As Griffin states the conference '…gathered participants from Canada to the Gulf and from Kansas to the Upper Ohio Valley. It [was] the first time such a large number of archaeologists [had] brought in new and exciting data from recent field work to add to the body of data from the Middle Woodland societies over this large area.' (page 266). Some of the papers he mentions were not included in this volume. Griffin points out the most common theme of these documents is regional diversity. Archaeologists have known Hopewell was not a single unified cultural expression long before the 1960s term 'Hopewell Interaction Sphere.' was coined and "[it] would be well if current writers would stop following that mistaken and misleading idea." (page 272).
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Reviews and critiques
Theoretical orientation in research and its results
Acculturation and culture contact
Special deposits
Ceramic technology
Smiths and their crafts
External trade
Visual arts
Burial practices and funerals
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Hopewell
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2004
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Eastern Woodlands
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Sarah Berry ; 2003
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
not specified
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
Middle Woodland
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
midwestern and southern United States
NotesAdditional notes
James B. Griffin
For bibliographical references see document 11: Brose and Greber
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
79088607
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Hopewell culture