essay

CHAPTER EIGHT Two geometric enclosures in the Paint Creek Valley: an estimate of possible changes in community patterns through time

ohio hopewell community organizationKent, OhioPublished In 1997 • Pages: 207-229

By: Greber, N'omi.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Greber examines the Seip Earthworks and Baum Enclosure to show how they were built in stages, probably over many generations (as opposed to being built in a single building episode). To build and use these great mounds people probably had to save resources for the great festivals. Evidence of this can be seen with diagnostic or ceremonial Hopewell artifacts that are found in domestic as well as ceremonial contexts. Greber states, 'The assumption that the fabric of Hopewell society combined facets of both 'domestic' and 'ceremonial' life effects a viewpoint for interpreting cultural dynamics through generations of site use.' (page 221). Greber proposes both mounds were built by the same community.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Identification
Theoretical orientation in research and its results
Cultural participation
Religious and educational structures
Settlement patterns
Household
Sacred objects and places
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Hopewell
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2004
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Eastern Woodlands
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Sarah Berry ; 2003
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
circa 1979-1993
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1900 BP-1500 BP (100 A.D.-500 A.D.)
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Seip Earthworks and Baum Enclosure; Paint Creek Valley, Ohio, United States
NotesAdditional notes
N'omi B. Greber
Includes bibliographical references (p. 227-229)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
96027659
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Hopewell culture