essay

Littoral-marine economy at Tulum, Quintana Roo, Mexico

lowland maya postclassicAustinPublished In 1985 • Pages: 50-61

By: Barrera Rubio, Alfredo.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Trade patterns have been of considerable interest in recent studies done in the 1970s at the coastal sites of Cozumel, Cancun, and Xelha, reflecting the fact that commercial activities were a crucial factor in the development of Postclassic communities along the east coast of Yucatan. The material base which sustained internal relationships, however, has received less attention at these sites. This article describes the various marine resources available to these Postclassic communities providing not only subsistence, but also commercial products for export, raw materials for the manufacture of artifacts, and with the surplus of products being used for the maintenance of non-productive activites necessary for the consolidation of the ruling class. In this study the author, through his analysis and interpretation of excavated materials at Tulum, attempts to shed some light on the local economy and social relationships at these sites (pp. 50-51).
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Laboratory analysis of materials other than dating methods in archaeology
Fauna
Fishing
Fishing gear
Animal by-products
Ornament
Bone, horn, and shell technology
Ceramic technology
General tools
External trade
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Postclassic Maya
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2001
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Middle America and the Caribbean
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Maya Area
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle ; 2000
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
1974-1975
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1100 BP-750 BP (900 A.D.-1250 A.D.)
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Tulum, Quintana Roo, Mexico
NotesAdditional notes
Alfredo Barrera Rubio
For bibliographical references see document number 2:Anonymous
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
84013168
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Mayas--Antiquities