essay

Farfan, general Pacatnamu, and the dynastic history of Chimor

northern dynasties : kingship and statecraft in chimor: a symposium at dumbarton oaks, 12th and 13th october 1985Washington, D.C.Published In 1990 • Pages: 227-242

By: Conrad, Geoffrey W..

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This document covers the traditional history and archaeological evidence concerning General Pacatnamu and his provincial capital; probably the site of Farfan, an intrusive Chimu administrative center with architecture similar to the [i]ciudadelas[/i] of Chan Chan, an [i]audiencia[/i], storerooms, and a burial platform. The burial platform presumably was a right awarded the general for his successful campaign. Other archaeological evidence such as ceramics, adobe brick styles, and radiocarbon dates show the city’s construction was contemporary with the early phase of monumental architecture at Chan Chan, between AD 1150 and 1250. This seems to confirm the historical reality of the Chimu conquest of the Jequetepeque Valley, of General Pacatnamu, and perhaps of a king called Ñançenpinco. The traditional histories, however, are not entirely accurate as three generations of kings represent three hundred years, raising the question of why other rulers were deleted from the traditional histories. The author believes that the traditional histories were a form of propaganda justifying the northern conquests, motivating people to advance all the way to Tumbes, and portraying the kings as superior beings whose decisions were just.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Traditional history
Chronologies and culture sequences
Provinces
Miscellaneous facilities
Burial practices and funerals
Personal names
Public opinion
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Chimu
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2015
RegionThe area the document pertains to
South America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Central Andes
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Sarah Berry; 2014
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
not specified
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1150-396 BP (AD 850-1604)
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
coastal La Libertad region (north coast) Peru
NotesAdditional notes
Geoffrey W. Conrad
Includes bibliographical references (p. 240-242)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
89023336
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Chimu Indians--Politics and government--Congresses
Chimu Indians--Antiquities--Congresses
Chan Chan Site (Peru)--Congresses
Peru--Antiquities--Congresses