essay

Ethnohistorical considerations about the Chimor

northern dynasties : kingship and statecraft in chimor: a symposium at dumbarton oaks, 12th and 13th october 1985Washington, D.C.Published In 1990 • Pages: 447-460

By: Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, María.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This is an ethnohistorical examination of some facets of Chimu government, drawn from early Colonial documents. Evidence for duality in Chimu socio-political organization proves inconclusive. Late sixteenth century court cases indicate that the Moche Valley consisted of small polities ruled by local lords who, in turn, were subjects of a lord of the larger ethnic group. Along the North Coast of Peru, power passed to a brother before being inherited by the next generation. Relations between the highlands and the coast in the north and south of Peru are also described, especially the push-pull between the highlands and the coast for water rights, water use, and canal intakes. The Chimu Capac’s uprising forced the dispersal or resettlement of many Chimu peoples. Place names, include names of canals or bodies of water, provide some evidence for where they may have been.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
History
Form and rules of government
Territorial hierarchy
Chief executive
Classes
External relations
Real property
Water supply
External migration
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Chimu
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2015
RegionThe area the document pertains to
South America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Central Andes
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnohistorian
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Sarah Berry; 2014
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
not specified
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1000-432 BP (AD 1000-1568)
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
north and central coast, Peru
NotesAdditional notes
Maria Rostworowski de Diez Canseco
Includes bibliographical references (p. 458-460)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
89023336
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Chimu Indians--Politics and government--Congresses
Chimu Indians--Antiquities--Congresses
Chan Chan Site (Peru)--Congresses
Peru--Antiquities--Congresses