essay

The infrastructure of Inka control in the Peruvian central highlands

inca and aztec states, 1400-1800 : anthropology and historyNew YorkPublished In 1982 • Pages: 153-171

By: Morris, Craig.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Craig Morris uses archaeological materials from two centers (Huánuco Pampa and the TAMPU of Tunsukancha) along Inca state roads to depict the political administration of empire in 1532. The recent evidence that Morris cites indicates that such centers provided a place for leaders to give their followers feasts accompanied with heavy drinking and much political-religious ceremony. This argument points to the fragility of administrative mechanisms, which more nearly resembled village rituals of solidarity than the full-time bureaucracies and standing armies too easily suggested, at least to the modern mind, by the elaborate state roadways, edifices, and stored goods constructed and accumulated by the Incas (p. 153).
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Theoretical orientation in research and its results
Prehistory
Mnemonic devices
Drinking establishments
Architecture
Public structures
Commercial facilities
Miscellaneous facilities
Travel
Travel services
Highways and bridges
Government activities
Military organization
Military installations
Logistics
traditionCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Inka
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2004
RegionThe area the document pertains to
South America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Central Andes
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle ; 2003
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
no date
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
468 BP (1532 A.D.)
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
central highlands, Peru
NotesAdditional notes
Craig Morris
Includes bibliographical references (p. 170-171)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
82006760
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Incas